Continuum Mechanics

Part 2 · Tensors

2.2 Transpose and composition

Source: Favata’s notes, appendix A.2, p. 12–13

Objectives

  1. Understand the transpose as the tensor that moves across a scalar product.
  2. Understand the product of tensors as doing one map after the other.
  3. Recipe: compute and transposes of products and dyads.
  4. Pictures: for every ; a composition in three panels.
  5. Vocabulary: transpose, composition (product).

Transpose

Definition 2.2.1Transpose

is the unique tensor with

It moves a tensor from one side of a scalar product to the other. The definition never mentions a basis; the matrix comes after.

Uniquenessbeyond the notes

If and both qualify, then for all . Take : then for all , so .

Theorem 2.2.2Transpose in components

: the matrix of is the transposed matrix. And .

Proofbeyond the notes

. For the dyad, .

Also .

Loading the demo…

Figure 2.2.1 Drag on the left and on the right. The left panel also shows , the right one . Wherever you put them, and agree: the transpose is defined by exactly that.
Warning

is not “ turned around”. In the demo the two dashed and solid arrows have nothing to do with each other individually; only the two scalar products match.

Composition

Definition 2.2.3Composition (product)

First apply , then : a product is read right to left.

Theorem 2.2.4Product in components

The free indices match on both sides; the dummy is summed. This is the row-times-column product of matrices.

Proofbeyond the notes

.

The column picture explains it: column of is applied to column of .

Loading the demo…

Figure 2.2.2 A simple shear , then a rotation by , . The middle panel is , the right one . The readout multiplies the matrices; compare its columns with the arrows on the right.
Non-example 2.2.5Products do not commutebeyond the notes

, but . Shear then rotate is not rotate then shear: swap the two in your head in the demo above and the letter ends up leaning the other way.

Identities

Theorem 2.2.6Rules for transposes and products

For all and :

  1. ;
  2. ;
  3. (the order reverses).
Proof (the notes call these easy to verify)beyond the notes
  1. .
  2. , so does the job that defines .
  3. .
Proposition 2.2.7More dyad rulesbeyond the notes
  • , since .
  • , since .
  • So .

The first rule, with , gives a useful trick: , a tensor as the sum of its columns paired with the basis. It is how the deformation gradient gets its Cartesian form (§3.2 The deformation gradient).

Exercises

Exercise 2.2.1beyond the notes

Show that and are symmetric for every .

Solution

by rules 3 and 2; the same for . This is why the right Cauchy–Green tensor is symmetric (§3.3 Change in length and angle).

Exercise 2.2.2beyond the notes

Compute and for , .

Solution

, . Different: the order matters.

Exercise 2.2.3beyond the notes

Show , with the tensor–dyad scalar product of Definition 2.1.5.

Solution

By definition . In components both are .