Part 2 · Tensors
2.4 Trace and the scalar product of tensors
Source: Favata’s notes, appendix A.2, p. 13–14 (trace, scalar product, norm, three properties, Exercise 1.1)
Objectives
- Define the trace without a basis, and compute it as the sum of the diagonal.
- Use the scalar product of tensors, and see it as a sum over any orthonormal frame.
- Understand why and are orthogonal, and what that buys in mechanics.
- Recipe: compute , , in components.
- Picture: , the same for every frame .
- Theorem: , an orthogonal sum.
- Vocabulary: trace, scalar product of tensors, norm of a tensor.
Trace
The trace is the linear map fixed on dyads by
Every tensor is a combination of dyads, so linearity fixes the trace of all of them:
, the sum of the diagonal of the matrix. Since the definition does not mention a basis, that sum is the same in every orthonormal basis, although the diagonal entries themselves change.
Properties, each a line of indices:
- ;
- ;
- , and so the trace of a product is unchanged by cyclic shifts: ;
- for skew , since .
Cyclic, not arbitrary: in general.
Scalar product and norm
The notes use the same dot for vectors and tensors (some books write ). In components, multiply corresponding entries and add, exactly as for vectors with nine components. It extends the dyad rule (Exercise 2.4.1), and .
It is a genuine scalar product: symmetric (), linear in each argument, and positive definite ( unless ). Handy identities: , , .
What it measures
The component formula hides the geometry. Take any orthonormal basis ; then , and
For every orthonormal basis ,
Map an orthonormal frame by both tensors and add up the scalar products of matching images. Each term depends on the frame; the sum does not.
- : the squared lengths of the images of any orthonormal frame.
- : how far each image points back along its own frame vector.
Loading the demo…
Three properties
- for all .
- , .
- for all .
Proof
- Choose : .
- Transpose both: , so .
- For any , . So for all , and by 1, . (The middle step is , the rule applied to .)
By 2, the split of Theorem 2.3.2 is orthogonal:
A symmetric tensor only sees the symmetric part of what it is paired with: for . In mechanics, the stress is symmetric, so the power it spends on a velocity gradient sees only the stretching, never the spin.
More consequences:
- : the cross terms vanish by 2.
- (Pythagoras).
- , since and .
Exercises
Prove
- ;
- ;
- .
Solution
- , and .
- .
- .
For the of Exercise 2.3.1, find and check .
Solution
(the skew part has no trace). ; ; ; .
Show that for all , and deduce for skew .
Solution
By Exercise 1.1.2, . Since , it is symmetric, so by property 2 the skew part of contributes nothing. For skew , .
Show that for , .
Solution
by property 2.